• Modern Chaos
  • Posts
  • MC.95: The Vibe Coding Maintenance Trap, What Open Source Taught Us About Trust

MC.95: The Vibe Coding Maintenance Trap, What Open Source Taught Us About Trust

I can't wait for Vibe Maintaining

Hello everyone,

We're witnessing something remarkable: the same economic forces that reshaped open source software over the past two decades are now repeating themselves in the vibe coding revolution. And if you're not paying attention to this parallel, you're about to get blindsided by a maintenance crisis.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: AI has commoditized the wrong part of software development. We've made creation trivially cheap while massively expanding the operational burden. And just like open source proved 20 years ago, the money was never in building the software—it was in deploying, maintaining, and operating it at scale.

The Open Source Playbook: Give Away Creation, Monetize Operations

Open source software represents an estimated $8.8 trillion in value if firms had to create it from scratch. Yet the companies behind this software discovered something counterintuitive: the real money isn't in the code—it's in everything that comes after.

Software maintenance typically consumes 50-80% of total cost of ownership, often costing 3-4 times the original development over a system's lifetime. Red Hat built a multibillion-dollar business on this insight, literally making billions "selling nothing"—free software with premium operations.

The most successful open source companies monetize through:

Cloud-hosted services: MongoDB Atlas generates 72% of MongoDB's total revenue—$1.5 billion annually—not by charging for database code, but by managing deployment, backups, and scaling.

Support and maintenance: Companies willingly pay 15-25% of original development costs annually just for guaranteed reliability and rapid incident response.

Professional services: While software is free, the knowledge to deploy it effectively is valuable. Integration and deployment services alone hit $8.8 billion in 2023.

The message is clear: code itself has become commoditized, while deployment, scaling, security, and ongoing operations retain significant value.

Vibe Coding: History Repeating at 10x Speed

Vibe coding—using AI to generate code through natural language prompts—is now doing to all software development what open source did to infrastructure: making creation dramatically cheaper and more accessible.

Leading startups in this space saw their combined valuation explode from $7-8 billion in mid-2024 to over $36 billion in 2025—a 350% increase. Lovable reached $100 million ARR just eight months after crossing $1 million. McKinsey estimates AI can improve developer productivity by 35-45%.

But here's the critical parallel: vibe coding commoditizes creation while massively expanding the deployment and maintenance challenge.

This democratization means millions of non-developers can now create software. A marketing manager can build a custom CRM. A teacher can create educational apps. The barrier between having an idea and building it is disappearing.

Yet this abundance creates new problems. As Wired reported, "vibe coding tends to yield a rough draft of code that may overlook specific contexts." Even more critically, "the essential safeguards and accountability mechanisms traditionally present in open source are either missing or severely fragmented."

The Trust Problem: Why Developer Track Records Will Become Currency

Here's where the parallel breaks down—and where things get interesting.

In the open source world, trust was built through transparent contribution histories. GitHub profiles became resumes. Commit histories became credentials.

But vibe coding introduces a fundamental opacity problem: you're not betting that software works—you're betting that it will be maintained.

When AI generates code, traditional trust signals disappear. You can't evaluate the developer's expertise because there is no developer in the traditional sense. You can't assess the architecture decisions because they were made by a language model optimizing for syntactic correctness, not long-term maintainability.

This creates what I call the Vibe Coding Maintenance Trap: code that looks production-ready but is actually a ticking time bomb of accumulated technical debt.

AI-generated code creates a "Tech Debt Loop." Code that looks syntactically correct gets merged without scrutiny. When issues emerge, teams use AI to fix them, introducing further patches that compound rather than resolve underlying problems. The accumulated debt has real consequences: increased maintenance costs, slower development, and fragile systems harder to scale.

This is where developer track records become the new currency.

In a world where anyone can generate code, the differentiator isn't creation ability—it's operational reliability. Organizations will increasingly ask:

  1. Who deployed this, and what's their uptime record?

  2. Who's maintaining this, and what's their incident response time?

  3. Who's responsible when this breaks at 3 AM?

  4. What's their track record for keeping AI-generated systems running reliably?

Just as Red Hat built trust through guaranteed reliability, the winners in the vibe coding economy will be those who can demonstrate operational excellence and maintenance competence.

The Coming Operational Crisis

Both open source and vibe coding follow the same economic trajectory—creation becomes cheap, while operational excellence becomes the differentiator.

Technical debt accumulates faster: When issues emerge in AI-generated code, teams often use AI to fix them, creating layers of patches that compound problems. Organizations adopting AI-generated code will face the same brutal reality open source companies discovered: enhancements after deployment typically cost 3-4 times the original development.

Operations expertise becomes scarce: While millions can now generate code, the skills to deploy securely, scale efficiently, and operate cost-effectively remain specialized. This is the gap that can't be automated away.

Monetization Strategies: The Deployment Economy

Both paradigms reveal consistent patterns focused on deployment and operations:

Platform-as-a-Service models: MongoDB Atlas doesn't charge for database code—it charges for managed hosting with automated backups and multi-cloud support. Deployment expertise and operational reliability are far more valuable than the code itself.

Consumption-based pricing: Usage-based billing captures revenue as systems scale. This works particularly well for vibe-coded applications, where initial creation is cheap but scaling requires substantial infrastructure investment.

Support and SLA guarantees: Enterprises pay premium rates for guaranteed uptime. The value isn't in the software—it's in the promise of reliability.

Integration and deployment services: As vibe coding democratizes creation, demand grows for professionals who can integrate AI-generated components into enterprise systems securely and reliably.

The Bottom Line: Trust Becomes the Moat

We're entering an era where software creation is becoming commoditized, but operational excellence remains expensive and difficult. The winners won't be those who can generate the most code—AI handles that. They'll be those who can deploy reliably, maintain efficiently, and operate cost-effectively at scale.

Just as Red Hat built a multibillion-dollar business on "selling nothing"—free software with premium operations—the most valuable companies in the vibe coding era will monetize operational excellence, not code generation.

And in this new economy, developer track records will become the primary trust signal. Organizations will pay premium rates for teams with proven maintenance capabilities, documented uptime records, and demonstrated incident response competence.

The parallel is clear: whether code comes from open source communities or AI language models, the fundamental economics remain the same. Software creation is becoming commoditized. The money lies in deployment, maintenance, and operations—the unglamorous work of keeping systems running reliably.

The irony? We've spent the past year celebrating how AI makes everyone a developer. But the real opportunity isn't in creation—it's in becoming the person organizations trust to keep AI-generated systems running when everyone else's vibe-coded prototypes collapse under production load.

Your track record for operational reliability is about to become your most valuable asset.

Until next Thursday 🎉
Olivier

Like this newsletter? Forward it to a friend and have them sign up here.

Until next Thursday 🎉

Reply

or to participate.